The two tracks you show are in different display densities. Your red graph is a wiggle track. I don't know what your black track is, it is set to "dense" You need to set the display to the same to see if the tracks display identical. If they are the same type. If your black track is a 'bigBed' it is not going to draw a graph as in the red track.
--Hiram On 6/13/12 10:04 PM, Harish B wrote: > Hi Hiram, > > We did not use any bigWig files. Please access the URL to see the output, > > http://141.217.48.207/temp/UCSC%20samples.PNG > > Thanks, > Harish > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Hiram Clawson<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Good Afternoon Harish: >> >> The mail list doesn't do attachments. >> >> Can you supply a URL to a browser view of the tracks in question ? >> >> Bed and bigBed don't draw graphs of data. Are you working with bigWig ? >> >> --Hiram >> >> >> Harish B wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The BigBed file lost one of the most important features we want. The >>> attachment is the graphs generated from the Bed and BigBed files. The red >>> one is by uploading the data to UCSC server and the black track is from >>> the >>> bigBed file. We want to track the height of each cluster (in the red >>> track, >>> different cluster has different height). However, bigBed may have missed >>> it. Can you please tell why this is happening? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Harish >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
