Mathieu Seigneurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:00:58 +0100:
> I believe the partition number is not really important, as long as: - > the partition is set as bootable (grub might be able to do that > automagically) Agreed. (Set as bootable means one of the first four partitions, since that's the number that fits in the MBR. At least the MS boot loader and related files must therefore be on one of those, tho the main system can be elsewhere.) > - all the win boot files reside fully inside the first 1024 cylinders of > the drive (so preferably: the partition itself should start and end in > those first 1024 cyls.) I know that used to be the case with W9x, but does eXPrivacy still have the 1024 cylinder limitation? If so, that's surprising. I'd have thought that would have changed with eXPrivacy at least. The 1024 limitation, if it still exists, might explain why it's reported working for some, but not others, however. <shrug> > or something to that effect. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
