Duncan ha scritto:
manuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on  Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:02:20 +0100:

Hi All,
I've ran revdep-rebuild a couple of times this week  and each  time i
run it it finds  a  broken link  referred  to  libqt-mt.so.3 and each
time It emerges
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-soundlibs-2007112 to correct the problem!
but the broken link is still there!?? I can't fix it! any ideas?

Realize that the emul-linux-x86 stuff is binary. That is, it's prebuilt; the ebuild simply installs it, because compiling it as 32-bit on a 64-bit multilib system is possible but rather a hassle to setup correctly, so the 32-bit binary emul-linux stuff is provided as a convenience for those who don't wish to go thru that hassle.

As a binary, you can remerge it all day every day and it's not going to change the binaries inside. Thus, you can't correct linking therein. A new binary package would be required for that.

However, such binaries aren't critical for a 64-bit system anyway. All they do is support 32-bit binary-only games and the like, if you choose to install and run them. Thus, the broken linkage isn't a big deal unless it's stopping you from running that game or whatever, and even then, it's not interfering with the normal functioning of the computer in general.

To fix it, you'd either need to wait for an updated build, merge whatever additional emul-linux package it's linking against (but the remerge should have cured the problem if it were that, as it would have pulled in the other package), or do the whole 32-bit chroot thing and use it rather than the emul-linux stuff.

If all you wish to do is get revdep-rebuild to shutup, that is, set it to ignore that package since remerging it isn't going to help, that's possible too. See the revdep-rebuild manpage for the details, but basically, you put an entry in either make.conf itself, or in a file in /etc/revdep-rebuild, telling revdep-rebuild what to ignore. (This feature has been in the ~arch revdep-rebuild version for some time. I assume it's in arch-stable versions by now. If not and you're running stable, consider running ~arch gentoolkit, using the appropriate package.keywords entry.)

Great!!
thanks for the help

Manuel

Reply via email to