On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 12:36, Benjamin Coles wrote:
> It's an effort to get a stable tree out there that doesn't change much. We
> had a few people from IBM that said they would love to change to gentoo
> but the portage changes too quickly and they can't risk emerging something
> and having it break afterwards. There are many more factors in
> implementating this but it's still in the planning stages.


Sounds like just a slower changing rsync tree, based on the stable.g.o
motif.


-- 
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to