-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 23 November 2003 09:23, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Sunday 23 November 2003 05:01 am, Terje Kvernes wrote: > > /proc/pci isn't going to stay around in 2.6 unless you explicitly > > ask to keep it. use "lspci" instead, and depend on pciutils. ;-) > > More depends will discourage people from using it. I was hesitant to > install the old stats on my laptop because it has very little space and it > had quite a few deps IIRC. > Why not parse /sys/bus/pci if it exists?
I don't won't to add depends (that's one reason the client is rewritten in python). The route taken will probably be: check for /proc/pci if not check for lspci if not, check for and try to figure out /sys/bus/pci mess last resort: don't report cards. - -- Meir Kriheli MKsoft systems http://www.mksoft.co.il -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/wUdGRkS5DWK1mZkRAj0zAKCDfy2nIPU7EtC+8GlkDnuLP66AcQCgnf1z NPT3Sebt3SL7YXZNIx4z8F8= =GGd/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
