On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 07:17, Heinrich Wendel wrote: > Am Saturday 13 December 2003 02:51 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 13:48, Heinrich Wendel wrote: > > > Based on the comments of the last thread on -dev about this GLEP I > > > created a new version. Please take a look at > > > > > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0016.html > > > > The substance of this isn't changed as far as I can tell: the brunt of > > creating all these .desktop files and maybe icons still lies on us. > > > > I still agree with a point made in the last thread: > > > > What's so bad about filing this as an upstream request instead? It > > significantly reduces our work since we don't have to do it for hundreds > > of packages. Instead, an upstream developer only has to do it once. > > Most desktop related applications already ship with a .dekstop file and an > icon, you just have to install them in the correct locations.
And those that don't? Do we do it ourselves or send upstream? I think you need to mention this in the GLEP.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
