Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The last time we seriously tested svn we found that svn choked on a > repository the size of the portage tree. The problem w/ arch (and w/ > metacvs, which would be my preference), is that neither system has a > good migration utility from cvs. The history of changes that is kept in > our cvs tree is extremely valuable, and thus any new system that does > not allow us to keep that history is a non-starter.
arch has cscvs to migrate the full history stored in a CVS archive to an arch (changeset-based) archive. Cheers, -- Dr. Denys Duchier �quipe Calligramme LORIA, Nancy, FRANCE -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
