On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:07:01PM -0600, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Friday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > applications today. I would argue there is a pretty good > > reason to keep any "Scheme" interpreters in lisp even if it > > is rather tedious. > > Yes, but dev-lisp is already chockers with common lisp stuff, so that > won't do. If the objective is to choose a name for the category which accurately describes its intended contents, I suggest "dev-lispscheme. One alternative, just off the top of my head, would be to use "dev-scheme" and drop a README in the Portage tree root directory which describes what each category is supposed to contain and points to other detailed documentation.
-- Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. --Ghost in the Shell
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
