On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 06:06, Steven Elling wrote: > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > recently, i re-emerged 'baselayout', > > which caused a set of candidates to be created for 'etc-update'. > > most were innocuous or easily understood, > > but one was for /etc/fstab , which seems both dangerous & unjustified. > > I agree! > > This has been brought to the attention of the devs already, discussed at > length, debated at length, and eventually ignored as if it is not a > problem. >
Bug #? Anyhow, it have not changed since November last year ... -- Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
