On Tuesday 18 January 2005 10:30, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:37:49 +0100 Ernst Herzberg > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Nice messages, all with wrong or not existent signatures. > > Kmail and Evo are currently b0rked with respect to certain signatures. > There's a reasonable chance that the sig on this message will look duff > to anyone using one of those broken clients, even though it's valid. Yeah, even with kmail from kde 3.4.0beta1 :-(
Does this mean kmail might display invalid signatures as valid? -- Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpuolW7fMDVW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
