On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 00:30 +0100, Ernst Herzberg wrote: > On Tuesday 18 January 2005 16:09, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 05:37 +0100, Ernst Herzberg wrote: > > > Nice messages, all with wrong or not existent signatures. > > > > Try another keyserver. I believe most of the developers use pgp.mit.edu > > as their keyserver. > > I'm using hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net (or de.pgp.net, or > serch.keyserver.net...), > and all servers syncronise very fast. Eample the key from daniel Goller, he > has uploaded the key, and now i am able to verfify his message successful. > Doug's signs are still bad, but the key seems to be valid, previous messages > dont had this problems. > > If a message has a bad sign, this message is _invalid_. If a softwareproblem > raises this probles, don't use it. If everybody or most people ignores wrong > signs, something goes completly wrong... > > Another question: Why are keys from new developer are no signed? A minimun of > one another dev must have trust him, or not? :-)
Trust him? Yes. Met him and able to prove that he is who he says that he is? No. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
