On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 05:34 -0600, Daniel Goller wrote: > if you touch unversioned eclasses you spill from ~arch right into arch > w/o much you can do about it, think people who run arch they want to > test or use gentoo?
...and you test it locally. You also should *never* make changes to an eclass that will break clients without not only testing the eclass, but also any applications that use that eclass and might break, including fixes to the ebuilds for those applications to allow them to work with the new eclass. Is it that hard to understand that you DO NOT COMMIT things that will break the tree? Personally, I don't care either way about versioned eclasses. My point stands whether they are versioned or not. Nothing should go into the tree that does not work, and nothing should go into the tree that breaks functionality that did work. Period. Those that do not follow these absolute laws of QA should have their developer status questioned. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
