On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 13:10 -0500, Anthony de Boer wrote: > Tying this to the Portage-tree collection-copyright issue, it might be a > good idea for all third-party-sourced patches, with e-mail headers or > other such authorship/source/copyright information still intact at the > start (and happily skipped by the patch command), to be gzipped and put > in distfiles, and the tree itself to be reserved for stuff written > specifically for the Gentoo project.
Really, they should all be in distfiles. > This does still leave large Gentoo-supplied patches in question; I'm > uncomfortable with the idea of us getting *that* far from the upstream > sources, though. They could get a copyright notice and get stuck in distfiles. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
