Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:56:51PM +0200, Alin Nastac wrote:Well, judging after bugzilla, I would say that all my ebuilds works (or have worked when I've submitted them). When I've become member in net-dialup team, net-dialup had over 80 opened bugs, and this after I solved a few dozens in my trial period.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Stick out a request on -dev. I bet someone here has a dsl device...
Okay, I buy it.
a) Devs, who has a fcdsl, fcdsl2, fcdslsl, fcdslusb and/or fcdslslusb (AVM FRITZ!Card DSL)? Step up and take net-dialup/fcdsl under your wing!
b) Who has a device that works with net-dialup/hcfusbmodem and is willing to become its maintainer?
c)...
In fact, who has any device that would work with some driver from net-dialup? I don't have _any_ device at all!
Then how can we know anything in net-dialup actually works? Sounds like net-dialup is sorely lacking devs with the relevant hardware.
Does any dev has any complaints about my work? I think not.
You wanna increase "quality" of ebuilds by taking net-dialup from me? Okay, let the bugs pile up again!
Does any of the QA supporters looked at http://bugs.gentoo.org/reports.cgi?product=Gentoo+Linux&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=ASSIGNED%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A ?
Gentoo isn't politics is getting the things done. At least this is my view.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
