On Tuesday 29 March 2005 20:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> I and several others worked out that it'd be a heck of a
> lot of effort for virtually no gain on the sed issue
Well.. having new sed inserted in the code as standard calls is not "a lot of 
effort" :)
Main problem was with perl, for me.

And if someone is editing an ebuild with a wrong sed call, fixing it is not a 
lot of effort.

We just need to make this known, else anybody don't known how to handle 
something like this :)

Anyway, I'm on the same tune of Stephen :)

-- 
Diego "Flameeyes" PettenÃ
http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/

Attachment: pgp9mvgXPaERG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to