On Tuesday 29 March 2005 20:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > I and several others worked out that it'd be a heck of a > lot of effort for virtually no gain on the sed issue Well.. having new sed inserted in the code as standard calls is not "a lot of effort" :) Main problem was with perl, for me.
And if someone is editing an ebuild with a wrong sed call, fixing it is not a lot of effort. We just need to make this known, else anybody don't known how to handle something like this :) Anyway, I'm on the same tune of Stephen :) -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenà http://wwwstud.dsi.unive.it/~dpetteno/
pgp9mvgXPaERG.pgp
Description: PGP signature