On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:51, Daniel Ostrow wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 11:41 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 16:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > Seeing that I added that output, I guess I should reply. The reason for > > > it was that only one profile per keyword will be checked at the moment. > > > Essentially, the output was both to make people aware of this fact and > > > to make sure people know *which* profile is being checked. > > > > > > I figure your going to tell me that all listed profiles should be > > > checked and I'd have to agree so, if it'll prevent the addition of > > > another useless file, I guess I'll get right on it. > > > > Give us a shout when you have something to test and I'll gladly fill up > > profiles.desc with the valid profiles. > > I'm going to be making at least 2 dev profiles over the next week for > ppc64, glad that will be able to be checked. > > Let us know when you need testers.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstubbs/repoman-2.0.51.19.patch Changes: * All profiles listed in profiles.desc are checked. * Masked packages are not checked unless --include-masked is specified, when - repoman is being called at category or tree level, and - commit has not been specified. * Removed several expensive but seemingly useless operation for a 90% speedup. With regard to the useless operations, they were there to restore the trees and config objects to initial state but I can't find anything that actually modifies their states. I ran a couple of category checks with and without the patch and didn't get any differing results, but keep your eyes open anyway. Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
