-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2005 02:46 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 14:31 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>>i remember complaining that using anything other than profiles.desc would
>>>be (1) cruft (2) just another file for people to be aware of (3) require
>>>arch maintainers to update it (4) pita (5) i like to touch myself at nite
>>
>>Right.
>>
>>Will it break anything to have multiple profiles per arch in
>>profiles.desc?
> 
> 
> no, but repoman will print a warning per duplicated profile ... we can just 
> make portage team change this behavior though :)
> -mike

Sounds good to me.  portage guys?

- --
"Leeffe-a is a germent ve-a cunteenoouoosly elter, boot vheech nefer seems tu
feet."
- -- Defeed McCurd

Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ BSD | cron | forensics | shell-tools | commonbox | netmon | vim | web-apps ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCTjiOC3poscuANHARAueKAJ9hCOh8VveWBEZcWFK+1cV9x3aPNgCeMBsZ
2F5B9Nrg1ponz/ajDqZoB6M=
=5Voo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to