yeah, i hit send, then jforman hit send. sorry.
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:42 pm, Michael Cummings wrote: > (fearing the jeff wrath) > > can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being > nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort > like they should have (ahem). Just...unsettling to see bugs marked as > resolved - make it sound like i did something rather than find that the > same problem had been reported a few times :) > > On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, Jeffrey Forman wrote: > > Bingo, I found the correlation between those bugs and the previous ones > > mentioned by Daniel. They have all been marked as duplicates of other > > bugs. Therefore bugzilla does not put a "resolution" in there, only > > marking them as status: resolved. > > > > -Jeffrey > > > > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:19 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: > > > Jeffrey Forman wrote: > > > > That seems odd, then again, those are VERY old bugs. Way before my > > > > time of looking at bugzilla to upgrade. > > > > > > Don't think it has anything to do with age. Just marked this one a dup > > > this morning. > > > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92539 -- -----o()o--------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net -----o()o---------------------------------------------
pgp15yEBzFG0R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
