Dan Armak posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 07:25:21 +0300:
> That's going to kill it everywhere, gcc4 included. The way KDE uses hidden > visibility is itself broken - not gcc. Until that's fixed, we're disabling > visibility support in kde. (There was a separate bug in gcc itself which got > fixed, which may have confused some people...) Ahh... yes. Distinctive separate bug makes more sense, now. I had only known about the gcc bug. So the KDE problem... Is that what's causing all those virtual function but destructor isn't virtual type warnings whenever I compile a KDE ebuild with gcc4? -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
