On Thursday 26 May 2005 00:37, Duncan wrote: > Marcus D. Hanwell posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > > below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100: > > I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that > > disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the > > patches). This was a new feature in KDE 3.4 which has caused at least one > > obvious bug, and possibly others that are less obvious[1]. > > [note the cross-posting] > > That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4? > I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to > that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =8^( > It seems that this has already been answered, but the KDE bug contains some more of the detail. It looks like KDE 3.5/4 is the target for getting proper visibility support. We haven't taken this decision lightly, and I believe it is the best option we have for a stable desktop.
KDE/QT 4 should have much improved visibility support, and I will be testing them once it is workable and I have a little spare time -- Gentoo Linux Developer Scientific Applications | AMD64 | KDE | net-proxy
pgpsW3NLQNlME.pgp
Description: PGP signature
