-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sven Wegener wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:56:43PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > >>I'm in favor of this. Would you mind calling it package.autouse, >>package.use.auto or are you set on .force? > > > As Mike already wrote those names are too confusing with the automatic > activated USE flags. We already had some suggestions in this thread, but > none of them actually matched the purpose of the file. At least in my > opinion. use.force matches it best, but the "force" part is a quite hard > term. How about use.profile? Because these USE flags are activated or > needed by the profile.
How about use.required, since they're required by the profile? Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCr5dlXVaO67S1rtsRApFKAKC917D/EwbWvRLY4R8uZ5WwcCk5zgCgw1jE 5solEKLmab3YZXV7qehfXSg= =VfRe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
