On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 18:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 11 July 2005 03:47 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 20:34 +0200, Richard Fish wrote: > > > >>>I.o.w. is it still necessary to have RC_DEVICE_TARBALL="yes" as a > > > >>>default or can we move to a pure udev system and change the default to > > > >>>"no". > > > >> > > > >>I've been running my boxes successfully with "no" since the option > > > >>showed up just fine :) > > > > > > > >I think people is under a misconception about this option and ... you > > > >really only need to enable this for a driver that is not sysfs aware > > > >(nvidia comes to mind - any others?), or if you have some custom nodes > > > >in /dev that you cannot do via udev ... And I am pretty sure (correct > > > >me if I am wrong) that all (or most?) in-kernel drivers are sysfs aware, > > > >and only a handful outside are not. > > > > > > Well, I do have a small issue with the software RAID (md) driver, in > > > that when autodetection is not performed by the driver (due to either > > > being a module or booting the system through an initramfs), no sysfs > > > entries or device nodes are created. > > > > > > Normally my RAID system is brought up inside my initramfs with static > > > nodes, so this really only affects my recovery CD, where I need to run: > > > > > > for d in 0 1 2 3; do > > > /sbin/mdadm --assemble --config=partitions --auto=md > > > --super-minor=$d /dev/md$d >/dev/null 2>&1 > > > done > > > > > > Maybe something similar will be required in /sbin/rc, like you currently > > > do for LVM and the device mapper? It isn't a critical problem > > > though...I am pretty sure there are only a few Gentoo users who will > > > ever see this...maybe as few as 1!!! > > > > Mike, what do you think? This viable? We could maybe add an init addon > > for md, and move the lvm/whatever stuff to that as well? > > i dont see the point ... ive already fixed raidtools / mdadm to generate > device nodes before running since udev doesnt do it correctly/at all
Ok, great .. just wanted to check ... Guess that is still in ~ ? -- Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
