On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:45:29 +0300 Ivan Yosifov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Alin. > > This was the type of constructive response I was hoping to provoke. > Don't get me wrong - I like genlop, however software "final state" does > not exist IMO, and bugfixing is hugely important with any software. > > Also, by "dead upstream" I mean that the page does not even exist > anymore, not just that there is no activity. If no one objects, I'll attempt to contact upstream on the status, and whether the author also considers this 'dead'. Depending on the answer, I'd be willing to assume work on it (most likely with a name change so as to avoid infringements, etc.). Soon as I get some mod_perl stuff sorted, I'll take a look at the bugs that are open. Anyone on portage-tools object to the intervention?
pgpicUjqIAsIJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
