-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ferris McCormick wrote: > 3. With USE=-dri, for testing purposes (and in the end, perhaps for > performance reasons as well), it seems better to change the make target > to HOSTCONF=linux-sparc, and let user's CFLAGS define the architecture. > When you do this, you get both a glx-capable libGL and a stand-alone > libGL
And why is this a good thing? I'm adamantly against building the non-glx libGL here for standard use, and I will continue to oppose it. Be normal people and do the same thing as everybody else in the world who's ever used libGL in X. > 4. For now, in case USE=-dri, I am not calling fix_opengl_symlinks. > Once I have all of X11R7 into test, I'll revisit this (and the Assembly > code question) to see what gives the best performance. Same as above. > These changes are not very pretty, but they have the benefit of > resulting in an ebuild for a mesa version of opengl which can actually > be tested independently from the rest of Modular X. It is even > conceivable that other architecture/graphics-card combinations might > require something similar. I don't see how the standalone libGL has any relation to the ability to test mesa with old or new X. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC+49vXVaO67S1rtsRArphAJ9UrEwb0zjOkOvOP9mC4CkYlK8+jACgpFoa mqJAZXt6otRKnsGGLGl2RC8= =C0d6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
