On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:36 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:27:34PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > This could still be done under profiles.  Personally, I like the idea of
> > something more like this:
> > 
> > project/os/arch/version for profiles
> > 
> > This would give us something like this:
> > 
> > default/linux/x86/2006.0
> > default/freebsd/alpha/2006.0
> > hardened/linux/amd64/2006.0/2.4
> > hardened/freebsd/x86/2006.0
> > uclibc/linux/mips/2006.0/cobalt
> > server/linux/x86/2006.0
> 
> I like...
> That's pretty much what I'm aiming for; not after forcing *you* to do 
> server/etc, just would prefer to see it structured so that others can 
> do so.

I might just go ahead and do this (at least the default/linux part) for
2006.0, so we can slowly transition away from the default-linux stuff as
we deprecate older profiles.

> That said, initial email was worded a bit strongly, so pardon ;)

No problem... it happens when one speaks of something they're passionate
about.

> > > Two scenarios for how this will result in visible issues for people- 
> > > 1) CVS users, aka, devs.  Devs *should* be running latest portage, 
> > >    which would know about the shift.  If they're running an older 
> > >    portage version and aren't willing to upgrade, they tag the 
> > >    symlinks themselves.  It's a minor annoyance frankly; assuming they 
> > >    read -dev (like they're suppossed to :P ), they'll know in advance 
> > >    it's coming.
> > 
> > Many devs use the latest stable versions of packages rather than testing
> > versions.  I tend to find this to be a good thing as there are often
> > bugs in particular combinations of package versions that aren't
> > necessarily spotted when running all ~arch.
> > 
> > Also, devs are not required to read or even be subscribed to -dev.
> 
> Agreed.  Implicit in all this is that I'm going to have to make a bit 
> of noise (and probably attempt and get it shoved out via gwn) prior to 
> doing it, so that I don't have ~100 devs who didn't hear the news 
> looking in my direction.

What other changes are you guys thinking of regarding profiles?

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to