-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Does this mean that we can get rid of the libstd++ dependency of gcc, and move it to the binary packages that depends on gcc 3.3 . I know this has been discussed before, but once it's stable I see no reason to keep the dependency in the gcc ebuild, when it could be in the binary packages.
Bjarke Mark Loeser skrev: > This is basically a heads-up email to everyone to say that we are probably > going to be moving gcc-3.4.4-r1 to stable on x86 very soon. If any of the > archs that have already done the move from having 3.3 stable to 3.4 could > give us a heads up on what to expect, that would be great. Only thing I see > as lacking is we might want to get a doc together on how to properly upgrade > your toolchain so we don't get an influx of bugs from users that have a > system half compiled with 3.3 and the other half with 3.4 so they get linking > errors. > > Thanks, > > Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDi0h3O+Ewtpi9rLERAibAAKCedui46gqRaBmwMpkufdQdw88ikQCfcgQu UybgL9DJQXbD93CxuiHztEQ= =+tUe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
