On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:39:10 -0500 Olivier Crete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those manifest files be > signed like the current ones? Would it be possible to have "per-line" > signing, or something like the stacked signing idea that was proposed > last month. If we are going to change the manifest format, might as > well do it properly. As stated in the GLEP, gpg is outside the scope of this. As for the questions, per entry sigs would invert one of the main goals (size reduction). And so far I haven't seen any sufficient answer to questions I raised on -core and -portage-dev regarding the transaction/stacked/fragmented/whatever-you-want-to-call-it Manifest signing proposed by Robin, so I'm still quite against it. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
