Hi Thomas,
Am Samstag, 4. März 2006 14:24 schrieb Thomas de Grenier de Latour:
> One point of view on this issues is that the ebuilds are wrong, because
> they are abusing the said USE flags, and they should rather die. Imho,
> it makes sense, but if such a strict policy was applied to every
> ebuilds which atm are abusing flags this way, it would become really
> hard to put anything in the make.conf USE variable without breaking
> "emerge -uD world".
Just to throw in my 2 cents into this discussion: I'm all against die-ing
during the update process. However, i think that stopping before the update
process would be the best solution at hand. I'd like to propose the addition
of a dedicated USE conflict detection to ebuilds which need it.
This detection function (for example pkg_prepare()) must be executed for every
package in the depgraph right after the depgraph has been built and has only
the possibility to either mark the package as 'go' or 'no-go'. In case that
any package has been marked as 'no-go', the whole process stops.
A possible implementation from the build side could look like this:
# the next two functions would be candidates for eutils.eclass
emutexuse() {
eerror "The following USE flags are mutually exclusive:"
eerror "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
eerror "Please choose only one of the above and disable the remaining"
eerror "USE flags. For additional information about this problem, see"
eerror "http://www.gentoo.org/<some place to store add. info about
this>"
echo
}
emissinguse() {
eerror "In order to enable the ${2} USE flag you need also to enable"
eerror "the ${1} USE flag. For additional information ...."
echo
}
pkg_prepare() {
local ret=0
if use foo && use bar ; then
emutexuse foo bar
ret=1
fi
if use fnord2 && ! use fnord ; then
emissinguse fnord fnord2
ret=1
fi
return ${ret}
}
Comments?
Danny
--
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
