Unless somebody else wants to do it, I am about to step in here to keep GNUstep in the tree. I already did some research on it, and it seems it needs an update, and the previous maintainer masked a few of the CVS ebuilds, so that eases things a bit. Seems many of the packages can use an upgrade, so I'll give it a try today to see if I can get it working again.
I'm going to look into more detail to it today, so if someone has objections, please state them now. I would really like to see a new GNUstep maintainer, but I'm not in the desktop herd or something, neither a frequent user of GNUstep any more. On 19-03-2006 03:23:26 +0100, Fabian Borschel wrote: > Hi Devs, > > On 2006-03-18 12:53:09 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >However, since the GNUStep herd is void, no one has stepped up to fix > >those ebuilds - meaning we have a bunch of useless, non-functional, > >live CVS ebuilds laying around in portage, see the list below. > > Did you look into bugs.gentoo.org? There are new ebuild (which don't > use CVS). Maybe not for all GNUstep ebuilds, but there are users who > are interested in GNUstep stuff (take me for an example). If you > search a new maintainer I would do the job. But I'm no Gentoo-Dev yet. > > Regards, > Fabian -- Fabian Groffen -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
