As a user I appreciate the talk to mark packages as low quality/AI slop. However I would like to bring up games-util/lutris. Lutris recently started including AI generated code, however as per comments made on issues on the github they have actively began to hide which commits were generated by ai[1]
> Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not. This does beg the question, what happens when a project actively obfuscates AI usage? Should lutris also be added to the list especially since now determining at which point AI usage was started is now impossible? - Luna [1] https://github.com/lutris/lutris/issues/6506#issuecomment-3976118573
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
