On 3/11/26 12:30 AM, Luna D Dragon wrote: > As a user I appreciate the talk to mark packages as low quality/AI slop. > However I would like to bring up games-util/lutris. Lutris recently started > including AI generated code, however as per comments made on issues on the > github they have actively began to hide which commits were generated by ai[1] > >> Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the >> Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring >> out >> what's generated and what is not. > > This does beg the question, what happens when a project actively obfuscates > AI > usage? Should lutris also be added to the list especially since now > determining at which point AI usage was started is now impossible?
This just tells me the answer is "all of this person's commits are". That's what LLM-bros tend to do anyway... (It's a self fulfilling prophecy. Using an LLM to do things for you generally results in those skills atrophying, so you start using the LLM even more as a result.) > - Luna > > [1] https://github.com/lutris/lutris/issues/6506#issuecomment-3976118573 > -- Eli Schwartz
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
