On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: > I feel really confused. Have you read the logs of the recent affair? > Devrel *hadn't* requested anything, infra made an action on their own > and *didn't* revert it even after being told by devrel that no action > was requested.
And then there was much discussion and it was largely resolved between the two projects, so I don't see how it's relevant to what I said. > > Sure infra has to pick up the pieces, that's their job. If they don't > like it and think that $someone is about to screw up something while > devrel doesn't think so and devrel don't change their mind after a talk > with infra, even then infra should have *no power* to suspend the dev in > question. At least that's how I see the infra's role as I already stated > several times on -core. Politics != system administration. > I said when devrel breaks, not when infra and devrel disagree. I can't comment on the most recent issue, I had no involvement, have no opinion, and don't feel like getting into a mailing list war over something that's already been resolved even if I did -- including current devrel/infra relations since it's no longer considered part of the proposed code of conduct :) -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
