Ned Ludd wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 03:14 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: >> On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:40:54 -0400 >> Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Umm ok. I've decided that root is root no matter how you look at it >>> and it's not worth getting into a vertical pissing contest over. > > >> So this is effectively an admission that infra intends to use its >> position of trust to unilaterally enforce its members' will upon the >> developers as a whole. I shall make a note not to disagree with any of >> you in the future. > > don't be a troll man.
I would agree with you that this was a troll, except that I happen to have seen a previous revision of your policy doc a day or two ago, which was titled "fscking behave" if I recall. Unfortunately, I didn't save a copy (I really wish I would have), but it appears that the doc evolved from "infra will suspend unilaterally as they see fit, and there is nothing devrel can even do about it" to its current form. I must say that I find the idea that you guys have been thinking along these lines at all to be somewhat disturbing. -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
