Luca Barbato wrote: > Alexandre Buisse wrote: > > >>[1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2006-April/000366.html >>[2] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/bzr-eval/ >>[3] >>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/dcm_evaluation_mercurial/ >>[4] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/git-eval.txt >> > > > > Those figures are slightly old, some of the issues are probably > addressed both on mercurial and git. > > I'd say that both are nice and are probably a good solution. > > if there is space and cpu I'd like to have someone playing with them and > send benchmark results. >
I am currently working on this, I have a page under proj/en/infrastructure where I am describing my efforts but I need a bit more time to make it pretty ;) Currently cvs2svn is almost done, and git cvsimport is chugging along. Not really a fan of bzr for us but we use it for pkgcore, so I'll fire that up as well. I haven't looked at mercurial but it is on the list ;) -Alec Warner > Mercurial should use a bit less disk and git should be a little faster > and with better merge/conflict resolution features. > > lu > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
