On Tuesday 16 May 2006 21:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Somehow I don't think > we're the ones spreading the FUD here. Should I call you an hypocrite or you'll apologise after calling me a FUD spreader?
> (Not that I'm opposed to BSD, as you know. I just find it rather > strange that you're using a "big change" argument here...) Let's see: On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > ++ for Halcy0n, and adding from an ebuild maintainer some more, many parts > of the current tree are at a minimum understaffed, if we're going to have > to start dealing with bugs coming from users experimenting with something > else but portage, we'd be _really_ taken over. I didn't say "big", I didn't say "change", I didn't even refer to the profile itself. I agreed with Halcy0n's post and I said that dealing with bugs that might be coming out of portage's misbehaviours being depended on might make us get taken over by bugs. So I didn't appeal to any "big change" argument, and you're still missing your point. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgpPfIQnBZn2T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
