On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 09:30 +0200, Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote: > On 5/17/06, Christian Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > With respect to the "hey support omg!" comments i say stick a big fat > > > README about being an experimental profile or something like that and > > > that's it. Usually bug reports require "emerge --info" so it'll be easy > > > to flag invalid ones anyway. > > > > Well. Marking a bug invalid doesn't make the real problem go away... but the > > users. > > I'd say that's exactly the intention of INVALID. If I were to file, > say, a bug in GCC at Gentoo's Bugzilla instead of GCC's, it would be > marked INVALID. (Unless, of course, the bug is caused by Gentoo's > patches.)
No. It should be marked as UPSTREAM and a bug should be filed in GCC's bug tracker or the authors emailed if there's no tracker. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
