On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:38:45 -0400 Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | As the QA lead, I am requesting that until the Council convenes and | decides on how we should proceed, that we not add anything else to | the tree for the sole reason of supporting another package manager's | features. This includes profiles or any other packages. This will | reduce headaches for all of us, and hopefully cut down on needless | arguments that get us no where.
Several arch teams have already stated their intention to go ahead with a Paludis profile, be it top level (ideal) or as a subprofile of their own individual profiles. Is there any technical reason that the QA lead wants to override the arch teams' wishes? -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
