Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Brian Harring wrote: >> Pkgcore is external, and will be making a run for official also- >> granted, easier to just state "you're just trying to screw with >> ciaranm" to disprove it (rather then arguing the points). > > Arguing the points aren't the issue. I just have a strong suspicion > that the official requirement is an anti-Ciaranm measure, particularly > considering that there is a huge contingent of people who would rather > die in a fire than let him back onto the developer team in order to make > paludis official.
Yet a suspicion isn't necessarily a fact nor true. There's a good chance that part of the issue is that, but to constantly bring up this fact only enforces it. People have the right to have an opinion with the people they may have to deal with. This is true for any package manager alternative, paludis just has people with more of a history that people know about than others. Please stop assuming that everything is directed at killing the project/people behind paludis and deal with the technical issues at hand. I'm getting sick and tired of people like you who are constantly bring up these non-technical topics thus pushing the issue into oblivion. Cheers- -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
