-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:00:43 +0200
> Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:37 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
>>> Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's 
>>> release.  I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the
>>> publication is always "on time" (whatever that may be). 
>> So what would a sane time period be? 12h? 24h?
>> The problem with that is that you need an editor who is available
>> during this period to add corrections, but with the new influx of
>> helpers I think we can manage.
> 
> It should be sent *at least* 24 hours in advance IMO so everyone gets
> a chance to check it. Better to send news that's a few days old than to
> send incorrect news.

Agreed. A full day in advance helps ensure that any needed corrections or
additions can make it in.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEi/aQrsJQqN81j74RAu9PAKCFkXjY1/u1s4Xk2y2z8m0RdTwHwACcCm4W
RRtsFocJpavIee8jaZpnnWM=
=vBld
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to