-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marius Mauch wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:00:43 +0200 > Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:37 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: >>> Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's >>> release. I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the >>> publication is always "on time" (whatever that may be). >> So what would a sane time period be? 12h? 24h? >> The problem with that is that you need an editor who is available >> during this period to add corrections, but with the new influx of >> helpers I think we can manage. > > It should be sent *at least* 24 hours in advance IMO so everyone gets > a chance to check it. Better to send news that's a few days old than to > send incorrect news.
Agreed. A full day in advance helps ensure that any needed corrections or additions can make it in. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEi/aQrsJQqN81j74RAu9PAKCFkXjY1/u1s4Xk2y2z8m0RdTwHwACcCm4W RRtsFocJpavIee8jaZpnnWM= =vBld -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list