On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 20:14 -0400, Daniel Ostrow wrote: > One thing I do ask...Lets all start now getting used to calling the > "portage tree" something different. I'm all for terms like "the tree" or > "the ebuild tree" or "the package tree" but at this point, given the > prompting subject matter, the idea of it being a tree which belongs to > portage seems outdated. This may seem like a small thing (like the teams > vs. herds argument that has been brought up countless times before) but > it is the silly little things like this that really do lower the mental > bar for new and exciting things to happen.
I suggest we start calling it "Larry's tree" and be done with it. Also, I am definitely for having an actual written standard for what defines an ebuild. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
