On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > While it is a "working" solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one. You can take over xine-lib and fix it however you prefer.
As this, as well as any other idea you can find, is just an HACK until portage devs implements the per-package use.mask that i asked WAY before 2.1 release, but was then left OUT of the freeze and thus of the featureset we can use 6 months from now, I REFUSE to change the behaviour. You should know better than me this problem, considering that you masked media-video/transcode on x86 2.4 profile because it was depending on linux-headers 2.6 (as it should have been) with v4l2 useflag enabled. You should have use.masked (as it was later done) that useflag as it's 2.6 specific, and I did it that way to satisfy sparc requirement of not having v4l useflag present for them, as it failed with 2.4 kernel. So if I didn't do it that way, forcing people wanting v4l support to use v4l v4l2, now I should still have the stupid, broken, idiotic transcode 0.6 in the tree, or one of the x86 deptrees broken, or one of the x86 deptrees with NO v4l at all. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgpks64mzEi0Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
