On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:57:07 +0500
"Anatoly Shipitsin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Although I do think you're making a big fuss over a tiny cosmetic
> > issue.
> >
> > This changes need not for sudo. It's need for fcron. And probaly
> > any
> package use define editor on configuration stage.
No, it's not needed for fcron at all, and I already explained why in
[1]. Progressing through [2-4] I thought the fcron issue might have
been fixed, but the virtual/editor discussion had started by then and I
decided I had nothing more to add. Again: fcron builds and works fine
without at all setting ./configure --with-editor= and the ebuild should
not set that option at all. Problem solved.
Kind regards,
JeR
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149376#c15 (don't set
--with-editor in the ebuild and just let it default to /usr/bin/vi,
which is only used if your env doesn't have EDITOR set to something
useful)
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149376#c17 (where I
explained that bug #65263 fixed the wrong problem)
[3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149376#c19 (where I
suggested setting it to something proper and available on hopefully
every system, like --with-editor=/bin/nano)
[4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149376#c22 (where I
continued to argue this approach and CC'd bsd@ to get their view)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
