Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> We (gnome) are not going to maintain gtk+-1.  We would very much prefer
> it get removed.  If some other person or group wants to maintain it, I
> guess it's fine with me; it will only cause Jakub and company headaches
> for re-assigning all the bugs that mistakenly get assigned to gnome.
>
> Note that maintaining it basically means being upstream, as there is no
> upstream for it.
>   
I have at least one package depending on it.
Feel free to make me the maintainer of the gtk+-1.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to