Alin Nastac wrote:
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
We (gnome) are not going to maintain gtk+-1. We would very much prefer
it get removed. If some other person or group wants to maintain it, I
guess it's fine with me; it will only cause Jakub and company headaches
for re-assigning all the bugs that mistakenly get assigned to gnome.
Note that maintaining it basically means being upstream, as there is no
upstream for it.
I have at least one package depending on it.
Feel free to make me the maintainer of the gtk+-1.
I will join you with that and whatever gnome-1 packages I need for
gtk-canvas (appears to be gnome-libs, bonobo, gnome-print, oaf,
gdk-pixbuf). I hope to look into porting gtk-canvas to not require
gnome-libs so I then only require gtk-1, but I'm not overly optimistic
on that.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
