On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:49 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:38:04PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:32:03 -0800 Brian Harring
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | You're ignoring that new style virtuals can have versions; thus
| > | virtual/tr-[arbitrary version <1]
| > | can be 'almost full 1 support'.
| > 
| > Which means what, in terms of parts of tr1 that are and aren't
| > supplied by various people? There's no nice neat linear progression
| > there, beyond most things requiring a few of the new basic
| > utilities.
| 
| The linear progression would be made up as you go- admittedly, if a 
| third provider shows up, scheme goes to hell.

A third provider like STLport or icc? STLport already supports tr1 hash
tables...

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail                                : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web                                 : http://ciaranm.org/
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to