On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:58:30 -0800 (PST) "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you are saying you cannot see Daniel's point of view at all? That > Gentoo should perhaps have input on a specification whose goal is to > essentially define what a Gentoo Package Manager should be? Gentoo, and any other parties, will have ample opportunity for input long before it gets finalised. Right now, though, soliciting comments from all and sundry will be more distracting than productive. We know it's currently incomplete and full of holes; we don't need to be told it. > >> Really, I find this weird and ambiguous and you should probably be > >> reinstated as a dev or be bumped off of PMS, which should be > >> managed by Gentoo developers only. If you want to make such a distinction, then it's managed by me, and I am a Gentoo developer. > Because it is difficult to determine 'people who know what they are > talking about'. I would say Brian Harring is one of those, but I > have a feeling you would disagree with me. The second requirement is an ability to work effectively with the other people writing it. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
