Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: [Wed Mar 14 2007, 10:02:47AM CDT] > In my view, there's one important penalty missing from this code of > conduct. Actually, the most important penalty - as a last measure, all > input from a person to the project will be denied. What I mean is that > for worst offenders, Gentoo must be ready to deny any contribution.
Ick. I should provide a detailed, logical explanation for why I don't like this idea, but it's mostly a visceral response for me--it just feels wrong. If some dev wants to proxy for Joe AnnoyingPerson so that the rest of the community doesn't have to deal with him, then I'm going to be perfectly happy with that arrangement. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpSh0hgB1OjE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
