On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:04:15 -0400 Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just because stuff isn't maintained doesn't mean that it's not being > > used, and if it's not broken I fail to see why it should be removed. > > I've seen many times people say "well, this hasn't been touched > since..." when a package has no bugs. Of *course* it hasn't been > touched. It just works. I wouldn't be surprised if there were quite > a few packages that fall into this category.
Except that the tree is a moving target. The obvious example being a package with X dependencies that hasn't been touched for four years... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
