Hanno Böck kirjoitti: > Hi, > > I noticed that the sqlite/sqlite3-useflags have no consistent meaning in the > tree. > > E.g. > - apr-util uses sqlite for sqlite-2.x support and sqlite3 for sqlite-3.x > support > - eix uses sqlite for sqlite-3.x support > Just the first examples I found, you can find countless for both of them in > the tree. > > We should imho decide if > a) sqlite means sqlite-2.x and sqlite3 means sqlite-3.x. > b) sqlite means enable sqlite-support always and sqlite+sqlite3 means if both > are available use sqlite-3.x instead of 2.x. > > I don't care which one (or a completely different one), but I think it should > be made clear. At least I think the current behaviour in the tree doesn't > really make sense. > >
We should remove 2.x from tree and use just sqlite. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
