On Friday 14 September 2007, Hanno Böck wrote: > I noticed that the sqlite/sqlite3-useflags have no consistent meaning in > the tree. > > E.g. > - apr-util uses sqlite for sqlite-2.x support and sqlite3 for sqlite-3.x > support > - eix uses sqlite for sqlite-3.x support > Just the first examples I found, you can find countless for both of them in > the tree. > > We should imho decide if > a) sqlite means sqlite-2.x and sqlite3 means sqlite-3.x. > b) sqlite means enable sqlite-support always and sqlite+sqlite3 means if > both are available use sqlite-3.x instead of 2.x. > > I don't care which one (or a completely different one), but I think it > should be made clear. At least I think the current behaviour in the tree > doesn't really make sense.
how about 'sqlite' means you want sqlite irregardless of version ... then sqlite-2 either gets punted from apr-util or it gets a local USE flag 'sqlite-old' for older cruft -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
